Glass v. Hillsboro School District 1J

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address whether associational discrimination claims are available under Title II, and noting that Titles I and III, but .not Title II, expressly include associational discrimination provisions
• parents of autistic child did not suffer separate and direct injury needed to state independent claims for associational discrimination based on disability
• parents not injured where 2 claim for negligence related to child’s discrimination at school
• “plaintiffs appear to recognize that to prevail on their associational discrimination claims, they must allege and prove services, and that they were discriminated against in obtaining those services solely because they were associated with disabled individuals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).