Glasper v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fact that victim fled before property was taken is inconsequential; but for the assault, there would have been no relinquishment
• fact that victim fled before property was taken is inconsequential; but for the assault, there would have been no relinquishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mendoza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-06-08· cited 146×
• Whitmore v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-07-12· cited 102×
• Watson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-15· cited 94×
• Etter v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-10-31· cited 62×
• Crawford v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-05-15· cited 47×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-11· cited 45×
• Grayson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-12-19· cited 44×
• Ellis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-09-19· cited 34×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-06-22· cited 24×
• Devia v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-30· cited 8×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-01-31· cited 2×
• Paul Edward Johnson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2019-08-09