Washington Supreme Court· 1/10/1985
Glasgow v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
Citations
- 693 P.2d 708
- 103 Wash. 2d 401
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that casual or trivial manifestations of discrimination alone do not violate the law
- noting that casual or trivial manifestations of discrimination alone do not violate the law
- holding sexual harassment deprived plaintiff of a workplace free of sex discrimination
- holding sexual harassment deprived plaintiff of a workplace free of sex discrimination
- noting harassment can be imputed when harasser’s rank in the company is high enough for that person to be the company’s alter ego
- \Sexual harassment as a working condition unfairly handicaps an employee against whom it is direeted in his or her work performance and as such is a barrier to sexual equality in the workplace.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andersen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 230×
- Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-22· cited 147×
- Antonius v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2004-12-23· cited 113×
- Dean v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1985-10-31· cited 104×
- MacKay v. Acorn Custom Cabinetry, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1995-07-20· cited 101×
- Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1987-01-22· cited 93×
- Loeffelholz v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court· 2012-09-13· cited 93×
- Martini v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1999-02-11· cited 87×
- Kahn v. SalernoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-17· cited 86×
- Raymond Woods, Jr. v. Graphic Communications Union Local 747/printing Specialties Local Union 380Ninth Circuit· 1991-02-20· cited 85×
- Paxton v. CrabtreeWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-12-06· cited 81×
- Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-02-29· cited 78×
- Cagle v. Burns and Roe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1986-10-09· cited 77×
- Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-01-13· cited 76×
- Washington v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-02-26· cited 75×
- MacDonald v. Korum FordCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-03-18· cited 68×
- Washington v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-12-04· cited 67×
- Alonso v. Qwest Communications Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-12-31· cited 66×
- Goodman v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-25· cited 63×
- Haubry v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-04-02· cited 62×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1982-08-09· cited 1,019×
- Sandra G. Bundy v. Delbert Jackson, Director, D.C. Department of CorrectionsD.C. Circuit· 1981-01-12· cited 489×
- James JOHNSON and Benjamin White, Appellants, v. BUNNY BREAD COMPANY, AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1981-10-16· cited 358×
- Katz v. DoleFourth Circuit· 1983-06-01· cited 329×
- Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1980-08-07· cited 164×
- Contreras v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1977-06-30· cited 129×
- Janiece S. NOLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph Maxwell CLELAND, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1982-09-08· cited 109×
- Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court· 1982-02-25· cited 107×
- Continental Can Co. Ex Rel. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 92×
- Deanna BARRETT, Appellant, v. OMAHA NATIONAL BANK, AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1984-02-03· cited 83×
- Ellingson v. Spokane Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-01-26· cited 61×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.