Glasgow Electric Light & Ice Co. v. Clark's Administratrix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 4 that “Cisco is not itself a member of the ‘public,’ and thus it is ineligible to bring a claim under the 5 fraudulent prong [of the UCL] for any alleged misrepresentations Capella made to it,” and 6 collecting cases
• dismissing fraudulent 2 UCL claim because “Cisco does not allege that members of the public have been deceived by 3 Capella’s alleged fraudulent misrepresentations….Indeed, Cisco does not even allege that 4 members of the public are aware of Capella’s misrepresentations”
• a corporate competitor is not entitled to the protection of the fraudulent prong of the UCL
• “Motions to strike are regarded with disfavor because of the limited importance of pleadings in federal practice and because they are often used solely to delay proceedings.”
• motions to strike are regarded with disfavor because of the limited importance of pleadings in federal practice and because they are often used solely to delay proceedings
• “Motions to strike are regarded with disfavor because of the limited importance of pleadings in federal practice and because they are often used solely to delay proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).