Glaser v. Legg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the date the opposing party is served notice of a motion to vacate an arbitration award, rather than the date the motion is actually filed with a court, is controlling for purposes of compliance with section 12
• “[T]he plain text of 26 [section 12] requires service of notice of a motion to vacate rather than mere filing within 27 the three month time limit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).