· 4/4/2005
Glaser v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
Citations
- 364 F. Supp. 2d 529
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6357
- 2005 WL 852434
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding there are two separate “occurrences” of employee dishonesty when two independent causes exist for an insured’s total loss due to dishonest acts by two employees who did not conspire to steal from their employer but instead acted independently
- finding there are two separate “occurrences” of employee dishonesty when two independent causes exist for an insured’s total loss due to dishonest acts by two employees who did not conspire to steal from their employer but instead acted independently
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.