Skip to main content
· 4/4/2005

Glaser v. Hartford Casualty Insurance

Citations

  • 364 F. Supp. 2d 529
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6357
  • 2005 WL 852434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding there are two separate “occurrences” of employee dishonesty when two independent causes exist for an insured’s total loss due to dishonest acts by two employees who did not conspire to steal from their employer but instead acted independently
  • finding there are two separate “occurrences” of employee dishonesty when two independent causes exist for an insured’s total loss due to dishonest acts by two employees who did not conspire to steal from their employer but instead acted independently

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.