Glasco v. Ballard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “prior federal court judgment is accorded the preclusive effect in subsequent state litigation that the federal courts would have attached thereto”
• “the doctrine [of collateral estoppel] ap plies even where the subsequent proceeding involves a different claim for relief.”
• “the doctrine of collateral estoppel applies even where the subsequent proceeding involves a different claim for relief”
• “the doctrine [of collateral estoppel] applies even where the subsequent proceeding involves a different claim for relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).