Glanville v. DUPAR, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following the Eleventh Circuit’s reasoning in McDonald and finding no implied private right of action under FICA
• similar holding as to claims under Federal Insurance Contributions Act and Federal Unemployment Tax Act
• “plaintiffs cannot recast their claims of FICA [Federal Insurance Contribution Act] and FUTA [Federal Unemployment Tax Act] 13 Plaintiffs rely on Rabin v. Bartlesville Redevelopment Trust Auth., 308 P.3d 191 (Okla. Civ. App. 2013

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).