Glantz v. Daniel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insufficient evidence for harassment protection order; petitioner’s testimony related to suspicions and belief that respondent had taken certain action against her, but petitioner was unable to adduce any confirming evidence that defendant was the actor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).