Glantz v. Association of the Bar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that advertising and solicitation activities are not the minimum contacts necessary for general jurisdiction
• holding that general personal jurisdiction was not satisfied where only 2% of defendant's annual total sales derived from forum state
• holding that it is not an abuse of discretion to deny a motion to transfer under section 1406(a) when the plaintiff's attorney could reasonably foresee that the forum in which the suit was originally filed was improper
• holding defendant’s solicitation activities, consisting of seventeen to twenty-one salesmen, two supervisors, and their automobiles, samples, and promotional materials, insufficient to establish general jurisdiction over defendant
• holding that it is not an abuse of discretion to deny a motion to trans- fer under section 1406(a) when the plaintiff's attorney could reason- ably foresee that the forum in which the suit was originally filed was improper
• stating that advertising activities within a state are not sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).