Gladstone Foundation v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that because the disability analysis for children is not work-focused, officials instead ask “whether the child's limitations meet one of the many listed categories of disability or are functionally equivalent to one of them”
• finding application of new Listings to pending claims not impermissibly retroactive in part because “[r]ights under a statute may be said to vest on the date of a judicial decision”
• “[W]e have held that amendments to changes in the rules for disability benefits may be applied to pending cases.”
• “The ALJ was entitled to credit the views of the special-education teacher, who knew N.A.M. well and had a good grasp of gradations among children with intellectual shortcomings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).