Gladfelter v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We have repeatedly held, however, that as long as the requirement to pay restitution is included in the sentence, setting the actual amount of restitution, even beyond sixty days from the sentence, is permissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gladfelter v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-05-27· cited 18×
• Langston v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-07· cited 7×
• Richard Allen White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-01· cited 2×
• Glispy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-02· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Martin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-08· cited 10×
• Stanley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-12· cited 5×
• Savory v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-18· cited 4×