Skip to main content
· 8/21/1989

Gjerde v. Fritzsche

Citations

  • 777 P.2d 1072
  • 55 Wash. App. 387
  • 1989 Wash. App. LEXIS 281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to consider on appeal a challenge to jury interrogatories because appellant waived the issue \by failing to bring the inconsistency in the answers to the interrogatories to the attention of the court at the time the jury was polled.\
  • “We decline to consider this challenge to the jury interrogatories, because Gjerde waived the issue below by failing to bring the inconsistency in the answers to the interrogatories to the attention of the court at the time the jury was polled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forrest, Grosse, Swanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.