Gividen v. Trustees School District No. 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “this type of litigation strategy ultimately acts to thwart meaningful legal analysis”
• finding no causal connection where the adverse employment action occurred before plaintiff filed a DHR complaint
• noting “plaintiff had worked at CNYPC for over a year before his injury and had previously requested and received a light duty assignment”
• describing “fourteen causes of action . . . incorporat[ing] all of the factual allegations preceding it as well as adopting all of the allegations of each preceding count” making it “virtually impossible to know which allegations of fact were intended to support which claim(s
• “Plaintiff has offered Mr. Mellor as the only other non-senior, non-supervisory white SHTA who was apparently ever afforded light duty in the Security Supervisor’s office----” (emphases added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).