Skip to main content
· 3/24/2000

Gittings v. Hartz

Citations

  • 996 P.2d 898
  • 1 Nev. 386
  • 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 42
  • 2000 Nev. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing for an abuse of discretion a district court's decision to strike a request for trial de novo
  • noting accusation that insurer was using the arbitration process to delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maupin, Shearing, Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.