Githens v. SHINSEKI

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Veterans Court’s determination regarding whether something was CUE was outside the court’s jurisdiction
• defining in- terpretation as “elabora[tion] upon the meaning of a stat- ute or regulation”
• “We have no jurisdiction over an issue of interpretation that does not exist.”
• “[We] may not review the Veterans Court for an ‘application of a legal standard to the facts of a particular case to determine whether there has been an error that is essentially factual in nature.’” (quot- ing Szemraj v. Principi, 357 F.3d 1370, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2004))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).