Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/6/2009
GIS VENTURE v. Novak
Citations
- 902 N.E.2d 744
- 388 Ill. App. 3d 184
- 327 Ill. Dec. 623
- 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 39
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Issues raised for the first time in an appellant’s reply brief are considered forfeited unless they are responsive to an argument raised in the appellee’s brief.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McLAREN
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- G.I.S. Venture v. NovakAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-11-05· cited 2×
- Barrett v. HenryAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-04-17· cited 2×
- Gallarneau v. Calvary Chapel of Lake Villa, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-06-27· cited 1×
- People v. VargasAppellate Court of Illinois· 2025-08-08· cited 1×
- STACKMAN v. City of GenevaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-10-16
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Alvarez v. PappasIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-04-17· cited 137×
- Allegis Realty Investors v. NovakIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-09-21· cited 121×
- Wisniewski v. KownackiIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-06-02· cited 75×
- Bowler v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-09-04· cited 15×
- People Ex Rel. Meyers v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1953-09-24· cited 10×
- Acme Brick & Supply Co. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-05-31· cited 10×
- In re WalgenbachIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-19· cited 9×
Other cases named GIS VENTURE v. Novak
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.