Giroux v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a Rule 60(b) motion is not a substitute for a timely appeal
• stating that a Rule 60(b) motion is not a substitute for a timely appeal
• “‘effect of the New Hampshire court’s final judgment on Giroux’s federal action is determined by applying New Hampshire’s res judicata law’”
• “‘effect of the New Hampshire court’s final judgment on Giroux’s federal action is determined by applying New Hampshire’s res judicata law’”
• \Giroux 'may not use Rule 60(b) as a substitute for a timely appeal’ ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).