Skip to main content
· 1/4/1996

GIROUX BROS. TRANSPORTATION, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS & TRUCKING INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, Defendant, Appellee

Citations

  • 73 F.3d 1
  • 19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2444
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 122
  • 1996 WL 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to decide whether to follow other circuits in adopting an exception for frivolous claims, while noting that such an exception would require a showing of immediate insolvency in light of the clear congressional intent to protect plans in withdrawal liability disputes
  • “However, any dispute regarding the timeliness of the Fund’s demand under § 1399(b)(1) is statutorily committed to arbitration in the first instance.”
  • “We therefore hold that questions concerning the timeliness of a plan sponsor’s demand are governed exclusively by § 1399(b)(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Aldrich, Coffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.