Girma v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the Board’s finding of no persecution in a mixed motive case because “the harm suffered was [not] motivated in meaningful part by a protected ground”
• “The evidence presented . . . must compel a reasonable fact-finder to conclude that the harm suffered by an applicant was motivated, at least in part by, a protected ground.”
• “The evidence presented ... must compel a reasonable fact-finder to conclude that the harm suffered by an applicant was motivated, at least in part by, a protected ground.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).