· 8/6/2015
Girma Aboye v. United States
Citations
- 121 A.3d 1245
- 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 360
- 2015 WL 4714153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “designated act” has a broad definition because “including” means “includes, but not limited to”
- determining that the list of enumerated crimes subject to enhanced punishment under the Bias-Related Crime Act was illustrative, rather than exhaustive, based on the statute’s use of the word “including” before the enumeration
- explaining that \designated act\ encompasses any criminal act
- explaining that “designated act” encompasses any criminal act
- “[T]he participle including typically indicates a partial list.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- “The question being one of statutory interpretation, our review is de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterly, Glickman, Kravitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.