Skip to main content
· 8/26/2010

Girdler v. State

Citations

  • 932 N.E.2d 769
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 1584
  • 2010 WL 3359537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that possession of recently stolen property is to be considered along with the other evidence in a case and the circumstances of the possession
  • noting that possession of recently stolen property is to be considered along with the other evidence in a case and the circumstances of the possession
  • noting that, in the context of charges for theft or receiving stolen property, possession of recently stolen property is to be considered along with the other evidence in a case and the circumstances of the possession
  • noting that “[i]t is a well-settled principle of Indiana law . . . that one may be charged with theft even if the evidence is stronger that the person was not the actual thief and actually received stolen property instead, and vice versa”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Friedlander, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.