Girard v. Rebsamen Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[w]hile we agree with appellant that no trade secrets were shown to exist in appellee’s business, the appellee’s proof did show that its customer list and related information were protected interests.”
• upholding as reasonable a covenant that also prohibited directly or indirectly soliciting or accepting insurance business from the covenantee’s clients
• upholding agreement that lacked a geographic limitation but only limited the employee from soliciting or accepting business from customers whose accounts he serviced at the time of his termination
• covenant reasonable when it prohibited former employee and seller of business from competing for the accounts serviced by the employee at the time of termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).