Giragosian v. Bettencourt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• validating the government's warrantless search of a licensed firearm dealer's inventory and records because \the owner of commercial property in a closely regulated industry has a reduced expectation of privacy in those premises\
• “It is not always possible to determine before any discovery has occurred whether a defendant is entitled to qualified immunity.”
• “It is not always possible to determine before any discovery has occurred whether a defendant is entitled to qualified immunity, and courts often evaluate qualified immunity defenses at the summary judgment stage.”
• “It is not always possible to determine before any discovery has occurred whether a defendant is entitled to qualified immunity, and courts often evaluate qualified immunity defenses at the summary judgment stage.”
• “It is not always possible to determine before any discovery has occurred whether a defendant is entitled to qualified immunity, and courts often evaluate qualified immunity defenses at the summary judgment stage.”
• under the mailbox rule, the petition is deemed filed when handed to 1 the Sacramento County Superior Court. (LD 2 (ECF No. 19-2).) On February 26, 2018, the 2 petition was denied in a reasoned decision. (LD 3 (ECF No. 19-3).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).