Giovani Carandola, Ltd. v. Fox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying O’Brien to ordinance that restricted erotic movements including fondling or touching certain body parts
• comparing Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary 745 (1996) (defining “fondle” as “to handle or touch lovingly, affectionately, or tenderly; caress”), Webster’s II New Riverside University Dictionary 494 (1984) (defining “fondle” as “to treat indulgently and solicitously: pamper”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).