Gioia v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the denial of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict of acquittal as to an aggravated child molestation charge since the testimony showed that the defendant had kissed the victim’s “private parts” with her pants pulled down
• affirming the denial of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict of acquittal as to an aggravated child molestation charge since the testimony showed that the defendant had kissed the victim’s “private parts” with her pants pulled down
• convictions for aggravated child molestation and child molestation affirmed where descriptions of acts using the terms “private parts” and “private area” were sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
• convictions for aggravated child molestation and child molestation affirmed where descriptions of acts using the terms “private parts” and “private area” were sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).