Ginter v. Ginter
Citations
- 79 Kan. 721
- 101 P. 634
- 1909 Kan. LEXIS 275
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Wills—Undue Influence. To destroy the validity of a will undue influence must amount to coercion, compulsion or constraint which destroys the testator’s free agency and by overcoming his power of resistance obliges him to adopt the will of another instead of exercising his own. It must be brought to bear directly upon the testamentary act, and particular parties must be benefited or disfavored as the result of the purpose and pressure of the dominating mind.</p> <p>2. -Fraud—Undue Influence. Generally the same considerations control when a testator is unduly influenced by misrepresentations and artifices usually comprehended by the term “fraud.” -Although in strictness fraud and undue influence are distinguishable, more often than otherwise it is a mere matter of a choice of terms. Always something sinister is involved which perverts the testator’s will by overcoming his power truly to express his real desires.</p> <p>3. - Presumption of Validity—Burden of Proving Undue Influence. When a contested will appears to have been duly executed and attested according to the statute of wills the law presumes it to be valid. This presumption must be overcome by proof, and the burden of proof rests upon whoever alleges it to be the product of undue influence or fraud.</p> <p>4. - Evidence of Undue Influence. In all such cases the proof must be substantial, so that the judges of fact, having a proper understanding of what undue influence is, may perceive by whom and in what manner it has been exercised, and what effect it has had upon the will.</p> <p>5. - Same. In making his proof a contestant is not limited to the bare facts which he may be able to adduce, but he is entitled to the benefit of all inferences which may be legitimately derived from established facts.</p> <p>6. - Same. Suspicion, conjecture, possibility or guess that undue influence or fraud has induced a will is not sufficient to support a verdict to that effect.</p> <p>7. -Sa
Judges: Burch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.