Ginsburg v. Richardson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting complaint that “lumped together” multiple defendants because the complaint was “bereft of any detail concerning who was involved in each allegedly fraudulent activity”
• “A complaint that attributes misrepresentations to all defendants, lumped together for pleading purposes, generally is insufficient [to meet Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirements].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).