Ginsberg v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Citations
- 66 Pa. Super. 118
- 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 206
Syllabus
<p>Negligence — Street railways — Passenger—Conflict of testimony —Case for jury.</p> <p>The appellate court will not reverse a judgment on a verdict in favor of a woman passenger against a street railway company for personal injuries, where the plaintiff’s testimony and that of her brother is in effect that plaintiff was thrown violently from her seat in a car, by a sudden jolt of the ear in leaving the rails, and was severely injured, although such testimony is directly contradicted by a number of passengers who were in the car and were eyewitnesses of the occurrence.</p>
Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.