Ginsberg v. Lamour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that response to a motion for default did not constitute general appearance because it did not request affirmative relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• National Safety Assoc., Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Company
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-05· cited 13×
• DiGiovanni v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-14· cited 8×
• Yakov Segalis v. Roof Depot USA, LLC and Billy M. Conrad and Mary Osbourne
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-21· cited 6×
• Paradise of Port Richey v. Estate of Konstantinos Boulis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-13· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cumberland Software, Inc. v. GREAT AM. MORTG.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-27· cited 50×
• Santos v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-01-06· cited 32×
• Kimbrough v. Rowe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-19· cited 22×
• Moo Young v. Air Canada
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-29· cited 19×
• Zarcone v. Lesser
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-10-18· cited 16×
• MTB Banking Corp. v. Bergamo Da Silva
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-28· cited 7×
• Buttigieg v. Prunetti
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-16· cited 3×