Ginsberg MacHine Co., Inc. v. J. & H. Label Processing Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, to satisfy the Statute of Frauds, a writing must: (1) be subscribed to by the party charged; (2) designate the parties to the agreement; (3) identify and describe the subject matter; and (4
• distinguishing Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon, 222 N.Y. 88, 118 N.E. 214 (1917)
• “[T]he September 2 letter omits at least one essential term, the duration of the supposed exclusive.”
• “The concept of ‘essentiality’ is relative. A term is ‘essential,’ and must thus appear in the ‘memorandum,’ if it seriously affects the rights and obligations of the parties and there is a significant evidentiary dispute as to its content.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).