Ginn v. Forrester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a silent record was insufficient to establish reversible error in a restricted appeal
• holding that a silent record was insufficient to establish reversible error in a restricted appeal
• holding that a silent record was insufficient to establish reversible error in a restricted appeal
• holding that when a party claims in a restricted appeal that a required notice was not given or a required hearing was never held, the error must appear on the face of the record
• stating that, in restricted appeal, error must appear on face of record and extrinsic evidence will not support restricted appeal
• concluding error not apparent on the face of the record where record was silent regarding notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).