Skip to main content
· 7/16/1979

Ginn v. Farley

Citations

  • 403 A.2d 858
  • 43 Md. App. 229
  • 1979 Md. App. LEXIS 377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[ a] zoning board, along with other administrative agencies, is generally not bound by the technical rules of evidence although it must observe fundamental fairness in dealing with the parties who appear before it.”
  • stating, that courts have power to define what constitutes practice of law
  • lay person, who was not an aggrieved party but who prepared notice of appeal, memorandum of law, argued case before Circuit Court, and noted appeal to the Court of Special Appeals, preparing the necessary brief and record extract, was engaged in the unauthorized practice of law
  • lay person, who was not an aggrieved party but who prepared notice of appeal, memorandum of law, argued case before Circuit Court, and noted appeal to the Court of Special Appeals, preparing the necessary brief and record extract, was engaged in the unauthorized practice of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrick, Gilbert, Morton, Samuel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.