Gingras v. Weber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no involuntary confession where defendant had stopped crying by the time he confessed
• “Because [petitioner’s] apparently unexhausted claim was not adjudicated on the merits, we likely should apply the pre-AEDPA standard of review, rather than the deferential standard of 28 U.S.C. §2254(d).”
• “Because [petitioner’s] apparently unexhausted claim was not adjudicated on the merits, we likely should apply the pre-AEDPA standard of review, rather than the deferential standard of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d).”
• “Because [petitioner’s] apparently unexhausted claim was not adjudicated on the merits, we likely should apply the pre-ADEPA standard of review, rather than the deferential standard of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).