Gingras v. Liberty Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because “no legally sufficient evidence supports the award under the lodestar method, we remand to redetermine attorney’s fees”
• determining whether a fee award that could not be sustained under the lodestar method could be sustained as a contingency fee
• referring to party “choosing the lodestar method of proving attorney’s fees” where statutes did not require that method
• reversing an award of attorney’s fees where the supporting affidavit, which used the lodestar method, provided only generalities
• determining whether a fee award that could not be sustained under the lodestar method could be sustained as a contingency fee
• reversing attorney’s-fees award when the attorney’s affidavit spoke generally about the tasks performed and the number of hours spent on those tasks

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).