Skip to main content
· 4/20/1984

Gingles v. Edmisten

Citations

  • 590 F. Supp. 345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting claim that remedial plan insufficiently remedied \dilution\ for some minority voters not included in \safe\ districts; effect of remedial plan upon them too speculative to assess on extant record
  • rejecting claim that remedial plan insufficiently remedied \dilution” for some minority voters not included in \safe” districts; effect of remedial plan upon them too speculative to assess on extant record
  • “In experience, correlations above an absolute value of .5 are relatively rare and correlations above .9 extremely rare.”
  • for purposes of determining minority vote dilution, \effective voting majority\ appropriate standard
  • for purposes of determining minority vote dilution, “effective voting majority” appropriate standard
  • \[I]n some elections the pendency of this very litigation worked a one-time advantage for black candidates in the form of unusual organized support by white leaders concerned to forestall single-member districting . . ..\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phillips, Britt, Dupree

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.