· 4/20/1984
Gingles v. Edmisten
Citations
- 590 F. Supp. 345
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting claim that remedial plan insufficiently remedied \dilution\ for some minority voters not included in \safe\ districts; effect of remedial plan upon them too speculative to assess on extant record
- rejecting claim that remedial plan insufficiently remedied \dilution” for some minority voters not included in \safe” districts; effect of remedial plan upon them too speculative to assess on extant record
- “In experience, correlations above an absolute value of .5 are relatively rare and correlations above .9 extremely rare.”
- for purposes of determining minority vote dilution, \effective voting majority\ appropriate standard
- for purposes of determining minority vote dilution, “effective voting majority” appropriate standard
- \[I]n some elections the pendency of this very litigation worked a one-time advantage for black candidates in the form of unusual organized support by white leaders concerned to forestall single-member districting . . ..\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Phillips, Britt, Dupree
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.