Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 6/22/2007

Gingerich v. United States

Citations

  • 77 Fed. Cl. 231
  • 99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 3430
  • 2007 U.S. Claims LEXIS 193
  • 2007 WL 1805164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A ‘plaintiff who is claiming a tax refund must prove [its] case by a preponderance of the evidence.’”
  • applying this burden to a claim for a tax refund
  • “[a] tax refund suit is a de novo proceeding.”
  • “A tax refund suit is a de novo proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lettow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gingerich v. United States

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.