Ginger v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting out the standard for 6 discrimination under § 1981 and the DCHRA
• finding no evidence of disparate treatment where 7 In any event, the Secretary has since revealed the identities of the screening-panel members to Mr. Phelan in the course of this case. See ECF No. 21-1, at 28 ¶ 79 (February 2022 screening panel members
• “The mere initiation of an investigation into a plaintiff’s conduct is not an adverse employment action when it has no effect on the plaintiff’s employment.”
• “To establish a causal connection, the adverse connection must take place after the employee's protected activity.” (citing Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 903 (D.C. Cir. 2006)) (emphasis in original
• “To establish a causal connection, the adverse connection must take place after the employee’s protected activity.” (emphasis in original) (citing Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 903 (D.C. Cir. 2006))
• “To establish a causal connection, the adverse connection must take place after the employee's 27 protected activity.” (citing Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 903 (D.C. Cir. 2006)) (emphasis in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).