· 6/23/2020
GINA BEAMAN v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing trial court’s order denying motion to stay because the priority of action rule required staying the state proceeding until resolution of the earlier-filed, parallel suit in federal court
- reversing trial court’s order denying motion to stay because the priority of action rule required staying the state proceeding until resolution of the earlier-filed, parallel suit in federal court
- the rule “generally requires that the forum that first gains jurisdiction over a matter retains exclusive authority over it.”
- “We remand with instructions for the court to stay these proceedings until such time as the federal district court determines” the defendant’s 19 No. 59097-2-II liability.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Mary W. Sheffield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.