Skip to main content
· 12/29/2022

Gimex Properties Corp., Inc. v. Reed

Citations

  • 205 N.E.3d 1
  • 2022 Ohio 4771

Syllabus

Record does not support appellants' contention that they were not permitted to testify at trial, and testimony introduced at trial established by clear and convincing evidence that appellants had knowledge of appellee's trade secrets and were working for appellee's competitor in a position that is substantially similar to the position they held with appellee, such that the trial court's issuance of a permanent injunction was not an abuse of discretion.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.