Gilpatrick v. Comm. of PA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant had the \necessary level of rudimentary understanding\ of Miranda's three precepts
• noting that the existence of a videotaped interview allowed this court to review the adequacy of the Miranda warning in light of a language barrier “not just from the ‘cold record,’ but—at least in part—in precisely the same manner as the trial court”
• overturning the suppression of a statement made by a Saudi native who had received Miranda warnings in English
• the court may rely, at least in part, on a defendant’s own statements expressing understanding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).