Gilmore v. Local 295, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unnamed defendant, a regional field manager, had substantial identity with corporate defendant, who was named as respondent in EEOC charge, because he was an agent of the corporate defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).