Gilmore v. Ivey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding factual statements of counsel, whether made during oral argument or in written briefs, ordinarily cannot be considered in determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists
• holding factual statements of counsel, whether made during oral argument or in written briefs, ordinarily cannot be considered in determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists
• noting the circuit court properly disregarded statements of counsel about testimony appearing in depositions not otherwise introduced into evidence
• holding the statements of counsel are not considered factual evidence
• explaining statements of fact can constitute an admission in determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists, but \factual statements of counsel . . . ordinarily may not be so considered\
• the trial court properly disregarded the statements of counsel that he claimed reflected testimony appearing in depositions not otherwise entered into evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).