Gilmore v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “fraudulent concealment does not toll the statute of limitations for fraud beyond what is provided for in § 516.120(5)”
• discovery as used in fraud claim accrual statute means actual discovery or time fraud could have been discovered with due diligence
• \There was no authority for survival and revival of a personal injury suit in Kentucky until it was legislated. . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).