Gilmore Steel Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sustaining Commerce’s authority to reconsider the sufficiency of a petition and terminate an investigation two months after issuance of an affirmative preliminary determination, when a fundamental defect in the petition came to agency’s attention
• “Ex parte communications per se are thus not improper ..., but a record of them must be maintained and made available.”
• to be “interested party” petitioner must be member of affected industry and petition must be backed by majority of that industry
• support of domestic industry necessary “to justify the exercise of agency’s remedial powers.”
• “A contrary holding wouldbe tantamount to saying that once an error initially evades detection, the ITA is thereafter powerless to take remedial steps, thereby compoundingthe error. ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).