Skip to main content
· 8/29/1990

Gilmartin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

Citations

  • 579 A.2d 1164
  • 1990 D.C. App. LEXIS 214
  • 1990 WL 125284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \prior knowledge or self-imposition of the difficulty ... [is] but one of the many factors that BZA [may] consider in reaching its decision\
  • \[B]ecause of the nature of the respective types of variances and their effects on the zone plan the higher 'undue hardship' standard applies to requests for use variances while the lower 'practical difficulty' standard applies to area variances.\
  • “[B]ecause of the nature of the respective types of variances and their effects on the zone plan, the higher ‘undue hardship’ standard applies to requests for use variances while the lower ‘practical difficulty’ standard applies to area variances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Belson, Mack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.