Gilman v. Pedersen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a plaintiff’s “statement might have constituted an anticipatory repudiation … had the defendant’s performance at that time been in substantial conformity with the requirements of the contract”
• repudiation is actionable only in absence of breach or repudiation by other contracting party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).