Gilman v. Kessler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[g]enerally, the issue of whether plaintiff exercised due care for her own safety is a question of fact for the jury”
• holding that “[g]enerally, the issue of whether plaintiff exercised due care for her own safety is a question of fact for the jury.”
• recognizing a split in authority regarding the availability of the provocation defense and finding that the defense was valid
• recognizing a split in authority regarding the availability of the provocation defense and finding that the defense was valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).