Gilman v. Haven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the medical expenses of an unemancipated minor child are damages suffered by the child’s parents, not the child
• concluding that under ORS 137.101(1), the court may only impose a compensatory fine payable to a “victim” that has suffered “economic damages” as defined in ORS 31.710
• concluding that under ORS 137.101(1), the court may only impose a compensatory fine payable to “victim” that has suffered “economic damages” as defined in ORS 31.710
• concluding that under ORS 137.101(1), the court may only impose a compensatory fine payable to a “victim” that has suffered “economic damages” as defined in ORS 31.710
• rejecting a compensatory fine awarded to a minor victim where the record did not show that the child incurred her own expenses
• remanding for resentencing because “there may be other permissible options that the trial court could adopt on resen- tencing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).