Skip to main content

Gilman v. Gilman

Citations

  • 956 P.2d 761
  • 114 Nev. 416
  • 1998 Nev. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “cohabitants owe no legal or financial support to one another”
  • explaining that “[p]arties are presumed to contract with reference to existing statutes,” and thus, “[a]pplicable statutes will generally be incorporated into the contract”
  • providing that this court reviews a modification of spousal support award for an abuse of discretion
  • explaining that those courts who have adopted the majority rule in cohabitation cases “hold that alimony payments used to benefit the cohabitant should be eliminated or reduced to meet the recipient spouse’s actual needs”
  • reviewing a district court ruling on a motion to modify alimony for an abuse of' discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maupin, Rose, Shearing, Springer, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.